TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of a cool classroom microclimate on cardiac autonomic control and cognitive performances in undergraduate students
AU - Barbic, Franca
AU - Minonzio, Maura
AU - Cairo, Beatrice
AU - Shiffer, Dana
AU - Cerina, Luca
AU - Verzeletti, Paolo
AU - Badilini, Fabio
AU - Vaglio, Martino
AU - Porta, Alberto
AU - Santambrogio, Marco
AU - Gatti, Roberto
AU - Rigo, Stefano
AU - Bisoglio, Andrea
AU - Furlan, Raffaello
N1 - Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/2/20
Y1 - 2022/2/20
N2 - An inverted U-shape relationship between cognitive performance and indoor temperature with best performance peaking at 21.6 °C was previously described. Little is known on classroom temperature reduction effects on cognitive performances and cardiac autonomic profile, during the cold season. Fifteen students underwent electrocardiogram recording during a lecture in two days in December when classroom temperatures were set as neutral (NEUTRAL, 20-22 °C) and cool (COOL, 16-18 °C). Cognitive performance (memory, verbal ability, reasoning, overall cognitive C-score) was assessed by Cambridge Brain Science cognitive evaluation tool. Cardiac autonomic control was evaluated via the analysis of spontaneous fluctuations of heart period, as the temporal distance between two successive R-wave peaks (RR). Spectral analysis provided the power in the high frequency (HF, 0.15-0.40 Hz) and low frequency (LF, 0.04-0.15 Hz) bands of RR variability. Sympatho-vagal interaction was assessed by LF to HF ratio (LF/HF). Symbolic analysis provided the fraction of RR patterns composed by three heart periods with no variation (0 V%) and two variations (2 V%), taken as markers of cardiac sympathetic and vagal modulations, respectively. The students' thermal comfort was assessed during NEUTRAL and COOL trials. Classroom temperatures were 21.5 ± 0.8 °C and 18.4 ± 0.4 °C during NEUTRAL and COOL. Memory, verbal ability, C-Score were greater during COOL (13.01 ± 3.43, 12.32 ± 2.58, 14.29 ± 2.90) compared to NEUTRAL (9.98 ± 2.26, p = 0.002; 8.57 ± 1.07, p = 0.001 and 10.35 ± 3.20, p = 0.001). LF/HF (2.4 ± 1.7) and 0 V% (23.2 ± 11.1%) were lower during COOL compared to NEUTRAL (3.7 ± 2.8, p = 0.042; 28.1 ± 12.2.1%, p = 0.031). During COOL, 2 V% was greater (30.5 ± 10.9%) compared to NEUTRAL (26.2 ± 11.3, p = 0.047). The students' thermal comfort was slightly reduced during COOL compared to NEUTRAL trial. During cold season, a better cognitive performance was obtained in a cooler indoor setting enabling therefore energy saving too.
AB - An inverted U-shape relationship between cognitive performance and indoor temperature with best performance peaking at 21.6 °C was previously described. Little is known on classroom temperature reduction effects on cognitive performances and cardiac autonomic profile, during the cold season. Fifteen students underwent electrocardiogram recording during a lecture in two days in December when classroom temperatures were set as neutral (NEUTRAL, 20-22 °C) and cool (COOL, 16-18 °C). Cognitive performance (memory, verbal ability, reasoning, overall cognitive C-score) was assessed by Cambridge Brain Science cognitive evaluation tool. Cardiac autonomic control was evaluated via the analysis of spontaneous fluctuations of heart period, as the temporal distance between two successive R-wave peaks (RR). Spectral analysis provided the power in the high frequency (HF, 0.15-0.40 Hz) and low frequency (LF, 0.04-0.15 Hz) bands of RR variability. Sympatho-vagal interaction was assessed by LF to HF ratio (LF/HF). Symbolic analysis provided the fraction of RR patterns composed by three heart periods with no variation (0 V%) and two variations (2 V%), taken as markers of cardiac sympathetic and vagal modulations, respectively. The students' thermal comfort was assessed during NEUTRAL and COOL trials. Classroom temperatures were 21.5 ± 0.8 °C and 18.4 ± 0.4 °C during NEUTRAL and COOL. Memory, verbal ability, C-Score were greater during COOL (13.01 ± 3.43, 12.32 ± 2.58, 14.29 ± 2.90) compared to NEUTRAL (9.98 ± 2.26, p = 0.002; 8.57 ± 1.07, p = 0.001 and 10.35 ± 3.20, p = 0.001). LF/HF (2.4 ± 1.7) and 0 V% (23.2 ± 11.1%) were lower during COOL compared to NEUTRAL (3.7 ± 2.8, p = 0.042; 28.1 ± 12.2.1%, p = 0.031). During COOL, 2 V% was greater (30.5 ± 10.9%) compared to NEUTRAL (26.2 ± 11.3, p = 0.047). The students' thermal comfort was slightly reduced during COOL compared to NEUTRAL trial. During cold season, a better cognitive performance was obtained in a cooler indoor setting enabling therefore energy saving too.
KW - Autonomic Nervous System
KW - Cognition
KW - Heart Rate
KW - Humans
KW - Microclimate
KW - Students
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152005
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152005
M3 - Article
C2 - 34871696
SN - 0048-9697
VL - 808
SP - 152005
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
ER -