TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of Lymph Node Dissection on the Prognosis of Thymic Carcinomas and Thymic Neuroendocrine Tumors
AU - Wang, Zi Ming
AU - Li, Feng
AU - Liu, Xin Ying
AU - Nachira, Dania
AU - Badakhshi, Harun
AU - Rückert, Jens C.
AU - Ismail, Mahmoud
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge the statistical assistance from Dr. Jiani Wang (Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charit?-Universit?tsmedizin zu Berlin). This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/6/1
Y1 - 2021/6/1
N2 - We aimed to analyze the effect of lymph node dissection (LND) and accurate lymph node (LN) status on the survival and prognosis of patients with thymic carcinomas (TCs) and thymic neuroendocrine tumors (TNETs) undergoing surgical treatment. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for patients who underwent surgical resection for TCs and TNETs during 1998–2016. LN status were defined as no LND (LND-), pathologically negative with LND (N0), and LN metastasis positive (N+). We investigated outcomes of LN status together with other clinicopathological features for overall survival (OS). Subgroup analyses were performed between LND-, N0, and N+ cohorts using propensity score matching, to analyze the significance of LND in prognosis. A total of 812 patients were enrolled, including 623 with TCs and 189 with TNETs. The proportion of LN metastasis positive in TNETs was 58.8% which was significantly higher than that in TCs (30%) (P < 0.001). In multivariable Cox analysis of OS, patients with LND- had a significantly worse prognosis than those with N0 (P = 0.018); there was no difference between N+ and LND- (P = 0.560). After propensity score matching, patients with N0 still had better survival than those with LND- and N+ in subgroup univariable and multivariable analyses of OS; however, the survival of patients with LND- and N+ was not significantly different in multivariable analysis. It was demonstrated that LND in TCs and TNETs can clarify the status of LN metastasis, to more accurately evaluate patients’ long-term prognosis.
AB - We aimed to analyze the effect of lymph node dissection (LND) and accurate lymph node (LN) status on the survival and prognosis of patients with thymic carcinomas (TCs) and thymic neuroendocrine tumors (TNETs) undergoing surgical treatment. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for patients who underwent surgical resection for TCs and TNETs during 1998–2016. LN status were defined as no LND (LND-), pathologically negative with LND (N0), and LN metastasis positive (N+). We investigated outcomes of LN status together with other clinicopathological features for overall survival (OS). Subgroup analyses were performed between LND-, N0, and N+ cohorts using propensity score matching, to analyze the significance of LND in prognosis. A total of 812 patients were enrolled, including 623 with TCs and 189 with TNETs. The proportion of LN metastasis positive in TNETs was 58.8% which was significantly higher than that in TCs (30%) (P < 0.001). In multivariable Cox analysis of OS, patients with LND- had a significantly worse prognosis than those with N0 (P = 0.018); there was no difference between N+ and LND- (P = 0.560). After propensity score matching, patients with N0 still had better survival than those with LND- and N+ in subgroup univariable and multivariable analyses of OS; however, the survival of patients with LND- and N+ was not significantly different in multivariable analysis. It was demonstrated that LND in TCs and TNETs can clarify the status of LN metastasis, to more accurately evaluate patients’ long-term prognosis.
KW - Lymph node dissection
KW - Prognosis
KW - Thymic carcinomas
KW - Thymic neuroendocrine tumors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098134572&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098134572&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.11.004
DO - 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.11.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 33181313
AN - SCOPUS:85098134572
SN - 1043-0679
VL - 33
SP - 568
EP - 578
JO - Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
JF - Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
IS - 2
ER -