TY - JOUR
T1 - Docetaxel and prednisone with or without enzalutamide as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: CHEIRON, a randomised phase II trial
AU - Caffo, Orazio
AU - Ortega, Cinzia
AU - Nolè, Franco
AU - Gasparro, Donatello
AU - Mucciarini, Claudia
AU - Aieta, Michele
AU - Zagonel, Vittorina
AU - Iacovelli, Roberto
AU - De Giorgi, Ugo
AU - Facchini, Gaetano
AU - Veccia, Antonello
AU - Palesandro, Erica
AU - Verri, Elena
AU - Buti, Sebastiano
AU - Razzini, Giorgia
AU - Bozza, Giovanni
AU - Maruzzo, Marco
AU - Ciccarese, Chiara
AU - Schepisi, Giuseppe
AU - Rossetti, Sabrina
AU - Maines, Francesca
AU - Fratino, Lucia
AU - Ermacora, Paola
AU - Nicodemo, Maurizio
AU - Giordano, Monica
AU - Sartori, Donata
AU - Scapoli, Daniela
AU - Sabbatini, Roberto
AU - Lo Re, Giovanni
AU - Morelli, Franco
AU - D'Angelo, Alessandro
AU - Vittimberga, Isabella
AU - Lippe, Paolo
AU - Carrozza, Francesco
AU - Messina, Caterina
AU - Galli, Luca
AU - Valcamonico, Francesca
AU - Porta, Camillo
AU - Pappagallo, Giovanni
AU - Aglietta, Massimo
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Background: Pre-clinical data suggest that docetaxel and enzalutamide interfere with androgen receptor translocation and signalling. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of their concurrent administration in the first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: In this open-label, randomised, phase II trial, previously untreated mCRPC patients were randomised 1:1 to receive eight 21-d courses of docetaxel 75 mg/m2, oral prednisone 5 mg twice daily and oral enzalutamide 160 mg/d (arm DE), or the same treatment without enzalutamide (arm D). The primary end-point was the percentage of patients without investigator-assessed disease progression 6 months after the first docetaxel administration. Results: The 246 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel, prednisone and enzalutamide (n = 120) or docetaxel and prednisone (n = 126). The 6-month progression rate was 12.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.1–20.6) in arm DE and 27.8% (95% CI 22.8–39.4) in arm D (chi-squared test 10.01; P = 0.002). The most frequent grade III–IV adverse events were fatigue (12.5% in arm DE versus 5.6% in arm D), febrile neutropenia (9.3% versus 4.0%) and neutropenia (7.6% versus 5.6%). Conclusions: The combination of enzalutamide and docetaxel appears to be more clinically beneficial than docetaxel alone in previously untreated mCRPC patients, although serious adverse events were more frequent. Our findings suggest that first-line treatment with this combination could lead to an additional clinical benefit when prompt and prolonged disease control is simultaneously required. Clearly, these results should be considered cautiously because of the study's phase II design and the absence of an overall survival benefit. Trial registration numbers: EudraCT 2014-000175-43 – NCT02453009.
AB - Background: Pre-clinical data suggest that docetaxel and enzalutamide interfere with androgen receptor translocation and signalling. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of their concurrent administration in the first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: In this open-label, randomised, phase II trial, previously untreated mCRPC patients were randomised 1:1 to receive eight 21-d courses of docetaxel 75 mg/m2, oral prednisone 5 mg twice daily and oral enzalutamide 160 mg/d (arm DE), or the same treatment without enzalutamide (arm D). The primary end-point was the percentage of patients without investigator-assessed disease progression 6 months after the first docetaxel administration. Results: The 246 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel, prednisone and enzalutamide (n = 120) or docetaxel and prednisone (n = 126). The 6-month progression rate was 12.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.1–20.6) in arm DE and 27.8% (95% CI 22.8–39.4) in arm D (chi-squared test 10.01; P = 0.002). The most frequent grade III–IV adverse events were fatigue (12.5% in arm DE versus 5.6% in arm D), febrile neutropenia (9.3% versus 4.0%) and neutropenia (7.6% versus 5.6%). Conclusions: The combination of enzalutamide and docetaxel appears to be more clinically beneficial than docetaxel alone in previously untreated mCRPC patients, although serious adverse events were more frequent. Our findings suggest that first-line treatment with this combination could lead to an additional clinical benefit when prompt and prolonged disease control is simultaneously required. Clearly, these results should be considered cautiously because of the study's phase II design and the absence of an overall survival benefit. Trial registration numbers: EudraCT 2014-000175-43 – NCT02453009.
KW - Chemo-hormonal therapy
KW - Combination therapy
KW - Docetaxel
KW - Enzalutamide
KW - Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.016
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.016
M3 - Article
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 155
SP - 56
EP - 63
JO - Eur. J. Cancer
JF - Eur. J. Cancer
ER -