TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic criteria currently proposed for "ictal epileptic headache"
T2 - Perspectives on strengths, weaknesses and pitfalls
AU - Parisi, Pasquale
AU - Verrotti, Alberto
AU - Costa, Paola
AU - Striano, Pasquale
AU - Zanus, Caterina
AU - Carrozzi, Marco
AU - Raucci, Umberto
AU - Villa, Maria Pia
AU - Belcastro, Vincenzo
PY - 2015/9/1
Y1 - 2015/9/1
N2 - Purpose When we published the diagnostic criteria for "ictal epileptic headache" in 2012, we deliberately and consciously chose to adopt restrictive criteria that probably underestimate the phenomenon, rather than spread panic among patients and physicians who are reluctant to accept this entity. Methods Here we discuss four intriguing clinical cases to highlight why we believe, to this day, that it is necessary to follow these restrictive diagnostic criteria. Conclusions EEG is not recommended as a routine examination for children diagnosed with headache, but it is mandatory and must be carried out promptly in cases of prolonged headache that does not respond to antimigraine drugs, if epilepsy is suspected or has been diagnosed previously. This is not a marginal or irrelevant question because possible isolated, non-motor, ictal manifestations should be taken into account before declaring that an epileptic patient is "seizure free" so as to ensure that any decision taken to suspend anticonvulsant therapy is safe.
AB - Purpose When we published the diagnostic criteria for "ictal epileptic headache" in 2012, we deliberately and consciously chose to adopt restrictive criteria that probably underestimate the phenomenon, rather than spread panic among patients and physicians who are reluctant to accept this entity. Methods Here we discuss four intriguing clinical cases to highlight why we believe, to this day, that it is necessary to follow these restrictive diagnostic criteria. Conclusions EEG is not recommended as a routine examination for children diagnosed with headache, but it is mandatory and must be carried out promptly in cases of prolonged headache that does not respond to antimigraine drugs, if epilepsy is suspected or has been diagnosed previously. This is not a marginal or irrelevant question because possible isolated, non-motor, ictal manifestations should be taken into account before declaring that an epileptic patient is "seizure free" so as to ensure that any decision taken to suspend anticonvulsant therapy is safe.
KW - Autonomic seizures
KW - Autonomic status epilepticus
KW - Epilepsy
KW - Headache
KW - Ictal epileptic headache
KW - Migraine
KW - Status migrainosus
KW - Tension-type headache
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941130125&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941130125&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.07.005
DO - 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.07.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 26362378
AN - SCOPUS:84941130125
SN - 1059-1311
VL - 31
SP - 56
EP - 63
JO - Seizure : the journal of the British Epilepsy Association
JF - Seizure : the journal of the British Epilepsy Association
ER -