Consensus five factor PANSS for evaluation of clinical remission: Effects on functioning and cognitive performances

Federica Pinna, Marta Bosia, Roberto Cavallaro, Bernardo Carpiniello

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Criteria developed by the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group (RSWG), based upon 8 core symptoms of PANSS, are generally used for evaluation of Remission. However, some concerns have arisen as regard to the ability of the RSWG criteria to detect truly remitted cases. This study aims to compare the severity criteria of remission defined by the RSWG (RSWG-cr) with more restrictive criteria, based upon the use of PANSS factor model. Methods: 112 chronic psychotic outpatients were examined. Symptomatic remission according to RSWGcr was compared with remission according to criteria based on the 20-items of PANSS considered in the consensus five factor model (PANSS-FCTcr), in relation to functional and neurocognitive outcomes. Results: Data from the study demonstrated the superiority of PANSS-FCTcr in identifying patients with higher functional and cognitive outcomes. Conclusion: PANSS-FCTcr seems to be suitable for use in both common clinical practice and research setting, being associated with improved identification of truly remitted patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-192
Number of pages6
JournalSchizophrenia Research: Cognition
Volume1
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Functioning
  • PANSS factors
  • Remission
  • Schizophrenia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consensus five factor PANSS for evaluation of clinical remission: Effects on functioning and cognitive performances'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this