TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes in multivessel coronary artery disease patients treated either with bioresoarbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent or permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent
T2 - 5-year results of the CENTURY II randomized clinical trial
AU - on behalf of CENTURY II study investigators
AU - Iñiguez, Andrés
AU - Chevalier, Bernard
AU - Richardt, Gert
AU - Neylon, Antoinette
AU - Jiménez, Victor A.
AU - Kornowski, Ran
AU - Carrie, Didier
AU - Moreno, Raul
AU - Barbato, Emanuele
AU - Serra-Peñaranda, Antoni
AU - Guiducci, Vincenzo
AU - Valdés-Chávarri, Mariano
AU - Yajima, Junji
AU - Wijns, William
AU - Saito, Shigeru
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Objectives: To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of a sirolimus-eluting stent with bioresorbable polymer (BP-SES; Ultimaster), in comparison to a benchmark everolimus-eluting, permanent polymer stent (PP-EES; Xience), in a prespecified subgroup of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) enrolled in the CENTURY II trial. Background: The use of coronary stenting in high-risk subgroups, like MVD patients, is rising. The clinical evidence, including long-term comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety benefits of different new-generation drug eluting stents, however, remains insufficient. Methods: Among 1,119 patients (intention-to-treat) enrolled in the CENTURY II prospective, randomized, single-blind, multicenter trial, a prespecified subgroup of 456 MVD patients were allocated by stratified randomization to treatment with BP-SES (n = 225) or PP-EES (n = 231). The previously reported primary endpoint of this study was freedom from target lesion failure (TLF: a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction [MI] and clinically-indicated target lesion revascularization) at 9 months. Results: In this MVD substudy, baseline patient, lesion and procedure characteristics were similar between the treatment arms. At 1 and 5 years, both BP-SES and PP-EES displayed low and comparable rates of TLF (5.3 vs. 7.8%; p =.29 and 10.2 vs. 13.4%; p =.29), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.4 vs. 1.3%; p =.33 and 0.9 vs. 1.7%; p =.43), respectively. Composite endpoint of cardiac death and MI, and patient-oriented composite endpoint of any death, MI, and coronary revascularizations were also similar. Conclusions: These results confirm good long-term safety and efficacy of the studied bioresorbable polymer stent in this high-risk patient population.
AB - Objectives: To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of a sirolimus-eluting stent with bioresorbable polymer (BP-SES; Ultimaster), in comparison to a benchmark everolimus-eluting, permanent polymer stent (PP-EES; Xience), in a prespecified subgroup of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) enrolled in the CENTURY II trial. Background: The use of coronary stenting in high-risk subgroups, like MVD patients, is rising. The clinical evidence, including long-term comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety benefits of different new-generation drug eluting stents, however, remains insufficient. Methods: Among 1,119 patients (intention-to-treat) enrolled in the CENTURY II prospective, randomized, single-blind, multicenter trial, a prespecified subgroup of 456 MVD patients were allocated by stratified randomization to treatment with BP-SES (n = 225) or PP-EES (n = 231). The previously reported primary endpoint of this study was freedom from target lesion failure (TLF: a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction [MI] and clinically-indicated target lesion revascularization) at 9 months. Results: In this MVD substudy, baseline patient, lesion and procedure characteristics were similar between the treatment arms. At 1 and 5 years, both BP-SES and PP-EES displayed low and comparable rates of TLF (5.3 vs. 7.8%; p =.29 and 10.2 vs. 13.4%; p =.29), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.4 vs. 1.3%; p =.33 and 0.9 vs. 1.7%; p =.43), respectively. Composite endpoint of cardiac death and MI, and patient-oriented composite endpoint of any death, MI, and coronary revascularizations were also similar. Conclusions: These results confirm good long-term safety and efficacy of the studied bioresorbable polymer stent in this high-risk patient population.
KW - clinical trials
KW - complex PCI
KW - coronary artery disease
KW - drug eluting
KW - percutaneous coronary intervention, stent
KW - stent design/structure/coating
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065167685&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065167685&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ccd.28224
DO - 10.1002/ccd.28224
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85065167685
SN - 1522-1946
JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
ER -