TY - JOUR
T1 - Il superamento degli Ospedali Psichiatrici Giudiziari
T2 - A new deal per la salute mentale?
AU - Casacchia, Massimo
AU - Malavolta, Maurizio
AU - Bianchini, Valeria
AU - Giusti, Laura
AU - Di Michele, Vittorio
AU - Giosuè, Patricia
AU - Ruggeri, Mirella
AU - Biondi, Massimo
AU - Roncone, Rita
AU - Biancorosso, Corinna
AU - Bosio, Roberto
AU - Bracco, Renata
AU - D'Avanzo, Barbara
AU - Felcher, Anna
AU - Landi, Errico
AU - Lorenzetti, Patrizia
AU - Meneghelli, Anna
AU - Mastrocola, Antonella
AU - Motto, Davide
AU - Origlia, Federico
AU - Pardini, Roberto
AU - Righi, Augusto
AU - Vallarino, Martine
AU - Xocco, Wilma
PY - 2015/9/1
Y1 - 2015/9/1
N2 - The date of March 31, 2015, following the Law 81/2014, has marked a historical transition with the final closure of the six forensic psychiatric hospitals in Italy. This law identifies a new pathway of care that involves small-scale high therapeutic profile facilities (Residenze per la Esecuzione della Misura di Sicurezza, REMS) instead of the old forensic psychiatric hospitals. The Law promotes a new recovery-oriented rehabilitation approach for the persons with mental disorders who committed a criminal offence, but lack criminal responsibility and deemed as socially dangerous. After a brief description of what happens abroad, this article highlights the positive aspects of the law that, as a whole, has to be considered innovative and unavoidable. The main debated problems are also reviewed, including the lack of changes to the Criminal Code; the improper equation between insanity and mental illness and social dangerousness; the evaluation of "socially dangerousness", based solely on "subjective qualities" of the person, assessed out of his/her context, without paying attention to family and social conditions suitable for discharge; the expensive implementation of the REMS, mainly based on security policies and less on care and rehabilitation, the delay in their construction, and the search for residential alternatives structures; the uncertain boundaries of professional responsibility. Finally, several actions are suggested that can support the implementation of the law: information programs addressed to the general population; training activities for mental health professionals; systematic monitoring and evaluation of the outcomes of the care provided to the forensic psychiatric population; implementation of Agreement Protocols and a better cooperation with the judiciary. Scientific societies dealing with psychosocial rehabilitation need to be involved in such issues relating to the identification of the best care and rehabilitation pathways, which should be implemented following closure of forensic psychiatric hospitals.
AB - The date of March 31, 2015, following the Law 81/2014, has marked a historical transition with the final closure of the six forensic psychiatric hospitals in Italy. This law identifies a new pathway of care that involves small-scale high therapeutic profile facilities (Residenze per la Esecuzione della Misura di Sicurezza, REMS) instead of the old forensic psychiatric hospitals. The Law promotes a new recovery-oriented rehabilitation approach for the persons with mental disorders who committed a criminal offence, but lack criminal responsibility and deemed as socially dangerous. After a brief description of what happens abroad, this article highlights the positive aspects of the law that, as a whole, has to be considered innovative and unavoidable. The main debated problems are also reviewed, including the lack of changes to the Criminal Code; the improper equation between insanity and mental illness and social dangerousness; the evaluation of "socially dangerousness", based solely on "subjective qualities" of the person, assessed out of his/her context, without paying attention to family and social conditions suitable for discharge; the expensive implementation of the REMS, mainly based on security policies and less on care and rehabilitation, the delay in their construction, and the search for residential alternatives structures; the uncertain boundaries of professional responsibility. Finally, several actions are suggested that can support the implementation of the law: information programs addressed to the general population; training activities for mental health professionals; systematic monitoring and evaluation of the outcomes of the care provided to the forensic psychiatric population; implementation of Agreement Protocols and a better cooperation with the judiciary. Scientific societies dealing with psychosocial rehabilitation need to be involved in such issues relating to the identification of the best care and rehabilitation pathways, which should be implemented following closure of forensic psychiatric hospitals.
KW - Forensic psychiatry
KW - Psychosocial rehabilitation
KW - Residential facilities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944752788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944752788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1708/2040.22158
DO - 10.1708/2040.22158
M3 - Articolo
AN - SCOPUS:84944752788
SN - 0035-6484
VL - 50
SP - 199
EP - 209
JO - Rivista di Psichiatria
JF - Rivista di Psichiatria
IS - 5
ER -