TY - JOUR
T1 - CK7 and consensus molecular subtypes as major prognosticators in V600E BRAF mutated metastatic colorectal cancer
AU - Loupakis, Fotios
AU - Biason, Paola
AU - Prete, Alessandra Anna
AU - Cremolini, Chiara
AU - Pietrantonio, Filippo
AU - Pella, Nicoletta
AU - Dell’Aquila, Emanuela
AU - Sperti, Elisa
AU - Zichi, Clizia
AU - Intini, Rossana
AU - Dadduzio, Vincenzo
AU - Schirripa, Marta
AU - Bergamo, Francesca
AU - Antoniotti, Carlotta
AU - Morano, Federica
AU - Cortiula, Francesco
AU - De Maglio, Giovanna
AU - Rimassa, Lorenza
AU - Smiroldo, Valeria
AU - Calvetti, Lorenzo
AU - Aprile, Giuseppe
AU - Salvatore, Lisa
AU - Santini, Daniele
AU - Munari, Giada
AU - Salmaso, Roberta
AU - Guzzardo, Vincenza
AU - Mescoli, Claudia
AU - Lonardi, Sara
AU - Rugge, Massimo
AU - Zagonel, Vittorina
AU - Di Maio, Massimo
AU - Fassan, Matteo
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - Background: V600EBRAF mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a subtype (10%) with overall poor prognosis, but the clinical experience suggests a great heterogeneity in survival. It is still unexplored the real distribution of traditional and innovative biomarkers among V600EBRAF mutated mCRC and which is their role in the improvement of clinical prediction of survival outcomes. Methods: Data and tissue specimens from 155 V600EBRAF mutated mCRC patients treated at eight Italian Units of Oncology were collected. Specimens were analysed by means of immunohistochemistry profiling performed on tissue microarrays. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: CDX2 loss conferred worse OS (HR = 1.72, 95%CI 1.03–2.86, p = 0.036), as well as high CK7 expression (HR = 2.17, 95%CI 1.10–4.29, p = 0.026). According to Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS), CMS1 patients had better OS compared to CMS2-3/CMS4 (HR = 0.37, 95%CI 0.19–0.71, p = 0.003). Samples showing less TILs had worse OS (HR = 1.72, 95%CI 1.16–2.56, p = 0.007). Progression-free survival analyses led to similar results. At multivariate analysis, CK7 and CMS subgrouping retained their significant correlation with OS. Conclusion: The present study provides new evidence on how several well-established biomarkers perform in a homogenousV600EBRAF mutated mCRC population, with important and independent information added to standard clinical prognosticators. These data could be useful to inform further translational research, for patients’ stratification in clinical trials and in routine clinical practice to better estimate patients’ prognosis.
AB - Background: V600EBRAF mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a subtype (10%) with overall poor prognosis, but the clinical experience suggests a great heterogeneity in survival. It is still unexplored the real distribution of traditional and innovative biomarkers among V600EBRAF mutated mCRC and which is their role in the improvement of clinical prediction of survival outcomes. Methods: Data and tissue specimens from 155 V600EBRAF mutated mCRC patients treated at eight Italian Units of Oncology were collected. Specimens were analysed by means of immunohistochemistry profiling performed on tissue microarrays. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: CDX2 loss conferred worse OS (HR = 1.72, 95%CI 1.03–2.86, p = 0.036), as well as high CK7 expression (HR = 2.17, 95%CI 1.10–4.29, p = 0.026). According to Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS), CMS1 patients had better OS compared to CMS2-3/CMS4 (HR = 0.37, 95%CI 0.19–0.71, p = 0.003). Samples showing less TILs had worse OS (HR = 1.72, 95%CI 1.16–2.56, p = 0.007). Progression-free survival analyses led to similar results. At multivariate analysis, CK7 and CMS subgrouping retained their significant correlation with OS. Conclusion: The present study provides new evidence on how several well-established biomarkers perform in a homogenousV600EBRAF mutated mCRC population, with important and independent information added to standard clinical prognosticators. These data could be useful to inform further translational research, for patients’ stratification in clinical trials and in routine clinical practice to better estimate patients’ prognosis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071460238&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071460238&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41416-019-0560-0
DO - 10.1038/s41416-019-0560-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 31474758
AN - SCOPUS:85071460238
SN - 0007-0920
VL - 121
SP - 593
EP - 599
JO - British Journal of Cancer
JF - British Journal of Cancer
IS - 7
ER -