TY - JOUR
T1 - Cardiac implantable electronic devices with a defibrillator component and all-cause mortality in left ventricular assist device carriers
T2 - results from the PCHF-VAD registry
AU - on behalf of the PCHF-VAD registry
AU - Cikes, Maja
AU - Jakus, Nina
AU - Claggett, Brian
AU - Brugts, Jasper J.
AU - Timmermans, Philippe
AU - Pouleur, Anne Catherine
AU - Rubis, Pawel
AU - Van Craenenbroeck, Emeline M.
AU - Gaizauskas, Edvinas
AU - Grundmann, Sebastian
AU - Paolillo, Stefania
AU - Barge-Caballero, Eduardo
AU - D'Amario, Domenico
AU - Gkouziouta, Aggeliki
AU - Planinc, Ivo
AU - Veenis, Jesse F.
AU - Jacquet, Luc Marie
AU - Houard, Laura
AU - Holcman, Katarzyna
AU - Gigase, Arno
AU - Rega, Filip
AU - Rucinskas, Kestutis
AU - Adamopoulos, Stamatios
AU - Agostoni, Piergiuseppe
AU - Biocina, Bojan
AU - Gasparovic, Hrvoje
AU - Lund, Lars H.
AU - Flammer, Andreas J.
AU - Metra, Marco
AU - Milicic, Davor
AU - Ruschitzka, Frank
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - Aims: To compare characteristics of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients receiving a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) with a defibrillator component (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillation, CIED-D) vs. those without one, and to assess whether carrying such a device contiguously with an LVAD is associated with outcomes. Methods and results: Overall, 448 patients were analysed (mean age 52 ± 13 years, 82% male) in the multicentre European PCHF-VAD registry. To account for all active CIED-Ds during ongoing LVAD treatment, outcome analyses were performed by a time-varying analysis with active CIED-D status post-LVAD as the time-varying covariate. At the time of LVAD implantation, 235 patients (52%) had an active CIED-D. Median time on LVAD support was 1.1 years (interquartile range 0.5–2.0 years). A reduction of 36% in the risk of all-cause mortality was observed in patients with an active CIED-D [hazard ratio (HR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46–0.91; P = 0.012), increasing to 41% after. adjustment for baseline covariates (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40–0.87; P = 0.008) and 39% after propensity score adjustment (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39–0.94; P = 0.027). Other than CIED-D, age, LVAD implant as redo surgery, number of ventricular arrhythmia episodes and use of vasopressors pre-LVAD were remaining significant risk factors of all-cause mortality. Incident ventricular arrhythmias post-LVAD portended a 2.4-fold and 2.6-fold increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death, respectively; carrying an active CIED-D remained associated with a 47% and 43% reduction in these events, respectively. Conclusions: In an analysis accounting for all active CIED-Ds, including those implanted during LVAD support, carrying such a device was associated with significantly better survival during LVAD support.
AB - Aims: To compare characteristics of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients receiving a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) with a defibrillator component (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillation, CIED-D) vs. those without one, and to assess whether carrying such a device contiguously with an LVAD is associated with outcomes. Methods and results: Overall, 448 patients were analysed (mean age 52 ± 13 years, 82% male) in the multicentre European PCHF-VAD registry. To account for all active CIED-Ds during ongoing LVAD treatment, outcome analyses were performed by a time-varying analysis with active CIED-D status post-LVAD as the time-varying covariate. At the time of LVAD implantation, 235 patients (52%) had an active CIED-D. Median time on LVAD support was 1.1 years (interquartile range 0.5–2.0 years). A reduction of 36% in the risk of all-cause mortality was observed in patients with an active CIED-D [hazard ratio (HR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46–0.91; P = 0.012), increasing to 41% after. adjustment for baseline covariates (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40–0.87; P = 0.008) and 39% after propensity score adjustment (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39–0.94; P = 0.027). Other than CIED-D, age, LVAD implant as redo surgery, number of ventricular arrhythmia episodes and use of vasopressors pre-LVAD were remaining significant risk factors of all-cause mortality. Incident ventricular arrhythmias post-LVAD portended a 2.4-fold and 2.6-fold increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death, respectively; carrying an active CIED-D remained associated with a 47% and 43% reduction in these events, respectively. Conclusions: In an analysis accounting for all active CIED-Ds, including those implanted during LVAD support, carrying such a device was associated with significantly better survival during LVAD support.
KW - Advanced heart failure
KW - Cardiac implantable electronic device
KW - Cardiac resynchronization therapy
KW - Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
KW - Left ventricular assist devices
KW - Mortality
KW - Ventricular arrhythmia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070737822&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070737822&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ejhf.1568
DO - 10.1002/ejhf.1568
M3 - Article
C2 - 31410955
AN - SCOPUS:85070737822
SN - 1388-9842
VL - 21
SP - 1129
EP - 1141
JO - European Journal of Heart Failure
JF - European Journal of Heart Failure
IS - 9
ER -