TY - JOUR
T1 - Biomarkers for psychiatry
T2 - The journey from fantasy to fact, a report of the 2013 CINP think tank
AU - Scarr, Elizabeth
AU - Millan, Mark J.
AU - Bahn, Sabine
AU - Bertolino, Alessandro
AU - Turck, Christoph W.
AU - Kapur, Shitij
AU - Möller, Hans Jürgen
AU - Dean, Brian
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Background: A think tank sponsored by the Collegium Internationale Neuropsychopharmacologium (CINP) debated the status and prospects of biological markers for psychiatric disorders, focusing on schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. Methods: Discussions covered markers defining and predicting specific disorders or domains of dysfunction, as well as predicting and monitoring medication efficacy. Deliberations included clinically useful and viable biomarkers, why suitable markers are not available, and the need for tightly-controlled sample collection. Results: Different types of biomarkers, appropriate sensitivity, specificity, and broad-based exploitability were discussed. Whilst a number of candidates are in the discovery phases, all will require replication in larger, real-life cohorts. Clinical costeffectiveness also needs to be established. Conclusions: Since a single measure is unlikely to suffice, multi-modal strategies look more promising, although they bring greater technical and implementation complexities. Identifying reproducible, robust biomarkers will probably require precompetitive consortia to provide the resources needed to identify, validate, and develop the relevant clinical tests.
AB - Background: A think tank sponsored by the Collegium Internationale Neuropsychopharmacologium (CINP) debated the status and prospects of biological markers for psychiatric disorders, focusing on schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. Methods: Discussions covered markers defining and predicting specific disorders or domains of dysfunction, as well as predicting and monitoring medication efficacy. Deliberations included clinically useful and viable biomarkers, why suitable markers are not available, and the need for tightly-controlled sample collection. Results: Different types of biomarkers, appropriate sensitivity, specificity, and broad-based exploitability were discussed. Whilst a number of candidates are in the discovery phases, all will require replication in larger, real-life cohorts. Clinical costeffectiveness also needs to be established. Conclusions: Since a single measure is unlikely to suffice, multi-modal strategies look more promising, although they bring greater technical and implementation complexities. Identifying reproducible, robust biomarkers will probably require precompetitive consortia to provide the resources needed to identify, validate, and develop the relevant clinical tests.
KW - Animal studies
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Clinical samples
KW - Imaging
KW - Psychiatric disorders
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928297914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928297914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ijnp/pyv042
DO - 10.1093/ijnp/pyv042
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84928297914
SN - 1461-1457
VL - 18
JO - International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
JF - International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
IS - 10
ER -