TY - JOUR
T1 - Biomarker-guided anti-egfr rechallenge therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer
AU - Ciardiello, Davide
AU - Martini, Giulia
AU - Famiglietti, Vincenzo
AU - Napolitano, Stefania
AU - De Falco, Vincenzo
AU - Troiani, Teresa
AU - Latiano, Tiziana Pia
AU - Ros, Javier
AU - Fernandez, Elena Elez
AU - Vitiello, Pietro Paolo
AU - Maiello, Evaristo
AU - Ciardiello, Fortunato
AU - Martinelli, Erika
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflicts of Interest: D.C. received a travel support from Sanofi; T.T. has served as a advisor and speaker for Roche, Merck-Serono, Sanofi, Servier, Novartis, Bayer; FP has served as advisor/speaker for Amgen, Roche, Lilly, Sanofi, Merck-Serono, Bayer, Servier; TPL has served as speaker for Servier; J.R. institutional financial interests (Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology): my institution received honoraria due to my investigator contribution in clinical trials from: Hoffman La-Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Amgen, Merck Serono, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, AbbVie, Array Pharmaceuticals, Pierre-Fabre, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Medimmune; EE Personal financial interests, honoraria for advisory role, travel grants, research grants (past 5 years): Hoffman La-Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Amgen, Merck Serono, Servier, MSD, Array Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb; Institutional financial interests (Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology): my institution received honoraria due to my investigator contribution in clinical trials from: Hoffman La-Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Amgen, Merck Serono, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, AbbVie, Array Pharmaceuticals, Pierre-Fabre, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Medimmune; EvM has served as advisor and speaker for Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Servier, Sanofi Genzyme, Roche, Merck, Eisai, Pfizer; F.C. has served as advisor and speaker for Roche, Amgen, Merck-Serono, Pfizer, Sanofi, Bayer, Servier, BMS, Cellgene, Lilly. Received institutional Research Grants form Bayer, Roche, Merck-Serono, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Takeda; E.M. (Erika Martinelli) has served as advisor and speaker for Astra Zeneca, Amgen, Bayer, Merck-Serono, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Pierre Fabre; G.M., V.F., S.N., V.D.F., and P.P.V. declare no competing interests.
Funding Information:
Funding: Regione Campania (I-Cure Research Project, Grant number: Cup 21C17000030007), Gruppo Oncologico dell’Italia Meridionale (GOIM).
Funding Information:
Regione Campania (I-Cure Research Project, Grant number: Cup 21C17000030007), Gruppo Oncologico dell?Italia Meridionale (GOIM). We thank Servier medical art.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/4/2
Y1 - 2021/4/2
N2 - The prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who progressed to the first and the second lines of treatment is poor. Thus, new therapeutic strategies are needed. During the last years, emerging evidence suggests that retreatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) in the third line of mCRC patients, that have previously obtained clinical benefit by first-line therapy with anti-EGFR MAbs plus chemotherapy, could lead to prolonged survival. The rationale beyond this “rechallenge” strategy is that, after disease progression to first line EGFR-based therapy, a treatment break from anti-EGFR drugs results in RAS mutant cancer cell decay, restoring the sensitivity of cancer cells to cetuximab and panitumumab. In fact, rechallenge treatment with anti-EGFR drugs has shown promising clinical activity, particularly in patients with plasma RAS and BRAF wild type circulating tumor DNA, as defined by liquid biopsy analysis at baseline treatment. The aim of this review is to analyze the current knowledge on rechallenge and to investigate the role of novel biomarkers that can guide the appropriate selection of patients that could benefit from this therapeutic strategy. Finally, we discuss on-going trials and future perspectives.
AB - The prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who progressed to the first and the second lines of treatment is poor. Thus, new therapeutic strategies are needed. During the last years, emerging evidence suggests that retreatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) in the third line of mCRC patients, that have previously obtained clinical benefit by first-line therapy with anti-EGFR MAbs plus chemotherapy, could lead to prolonged survival. The rationale beyond this “rechallenge” strategy is that, after disease progression to first line EGFR-based therapy, a treatment break from anti-EGFR drugs results in RAS mutant cancer cell decay, restoring the sensitivity of cancer cells to cetuximab and panitumumab. In fact, rechallenge treatment with anti-EGFR drugs has shown promising clinical activity, particularly in patients with plasma RAS and BRAF wild type circulating tumor DNA, as defined by liquid biopsy analysis at baseline treatment. The aim of this review is to analyze the current knowledge on rechallenge and to investigate the role of novel biomarkers that can guide the appropriate selection of patients that could benefit from this therapeutic strategy. Finally, we discuss on-going trials and future perspectives.
KW - Anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies
KW - Metastatic colorectal cancer
KW - Rechallenge
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104279933&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104279933&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers13081941
DO - 10.3390/cancers13081941
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85104279933
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 13
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 8
M1 - 1941
ER -