TY - JOUR
T1 - Biofeedback-produced hemispheric asymmetry of slow cortical potentials and its behavioural effects
AU - Rockstroh, Brigitte
AU - Elbert, Thomas
AU - Birbaumer, Niels
AU - Lutzenberger, Werner
PY - 1990
Y1 - 1990
N2 - Two studies served to examine behavioural effects of slow cortical potentials (SPs). SPs were manipulated by means of a biofeedback procedure. The ability of human subjects to alter SPs differentially between the two hemispheres - specifically over the lateral aspects of teh central sulcus - was tested by providing feedback ofthe SP difference betwrrn C3 and C4. In Expt. I, 21 of the 45 subjects produced hemispheric asymmetries of more than 2 μV between C3 and C4 on an average after 80 trials of analogue, continuous and immediate feedback. In Expt. II, SP changes were fed back digitally at the end of each trial. Within 120 trials, 20 of the 48 subjects reached the criterion of a minimum 2-μV difference in SPs between C3 and C4 on the average. Average differentiation remained significantly below the SP differentiations achieved for continuous feedback. Trials with feedback were followed by 'task' trials without feedback, during which subjects were still requested to produce SP changes but also had to complete a task: Either sensorimotor tasks (Expt. I) or forced choice handedness tasks (Expt. II) were presented to evaluate behavioural consequences of hemispheric SP differences. In subjects achieving the required SP differentiation it affected the behavioural output in agreement with the known functions of the respective cortical area.
AB - Two studies served to examine behavioural effects of slow cortical potentials (SPs). SPs were manipulated by means of a biofeedback procedure. The ability of human subjects to alter SPs differentially between the two hemispheres - specifically over the lateral aspects of teh central sulcus - was tested by providing feedback ofthe SP difference betwrrn C3 and C4. In Expt. I, 21 of the 45 subjects produced hemispheric asymmetries of more than 2 μV between C3 and C4 on an average after 80 trials of analogue, continuous and immediate feedback. In Expt. II, SP changes were fed back digitally at the end of each trial. Within 120 trials, 20 of the 48 subjects reached the criterion of a minimum 2-μV difference in SPs between C3 and C4 on the average. Average differentiation remained significantly below the SP differentiations achieved for continuous feedback. Trials with feedback were followed by 'task' trials without feedback, during which subjects were still requested to produce SP changes but also had to complete a task: Either sensorimotor tasks (Expt. I) or forced choice handedness tasks (Expt. II) were presented to evaluate behavioural consequences of hemispheric SP differences. In subjects achieving the required SP differentiation it affected the behavioural output in agreement with the known functions of the respective cortical area.
KW - Biofeedback
KW - Cerebral lateral asymmetry
KW - Contingent negative variation
KW - EEG self-regulation
KW - Instrumental learning
KW - Slow cortical potential
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025162581&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025162581&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0167-8760(90)90069-P
DO - 10.1016/0167-8760(90)90069-P
M3 - Article
C2 - 2228749
AN - SCOPUS:0025162581
SN - 0167-8760
VL - 9
SP - 151
EP - 165
JO - International Journal of Psychophysiology
JF - International Journal of Psychophysiology
IS - 2
ER -