TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing quality of life in long-term cancer survivors
T2 - A review of available tools
AU - Muzzatti, Barbara
AU - Annunziata, M. Antonietta
PY - 2013/11
Y1 - 2013/11
N2 - Purpose: Considering that the number of people with oncological history is constantly growing, and that cancer survivorship has very specific long-term and late (both medical and psychosocial) effects, it seems useful to have specific multidimensional instruments to measure quality of life (QoL). This contribution aims to describe the characteristics and psychometric properties of QoL assessment tools specifically designed for the condition of long-term cancer survivorship. Methods: We queried the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases, which allowed us to identify the pertinent papers, classified by the QoL tool they refer to. We then extracted the characteristics and the psychometric properties from each study. Results: From the initial 902 papers, 18 meet the selection criteria referring to eight QoL measurements. However, a multipart validation process in order to verify validity and reliability was only started for two of these tools. Conclusions: Even though clinical practice documents that long-term cancer survivors present with different symptoms and functional challenges compared to patients who are currently undergoing treatment as well as the general population, we still lack a quality of life tool that is specific for them, and that has verified psychometric properties. Even though some of the instruments we described are promising, it is necessary to continue their refinement.
AB - Purpose: Considering that the number of people with oncological history is constantly growing, and that cancer survivorship has very specific long-term and late (both medical and psychosocial) effects, it seems useful to have specific multidimensional instruments to measure quality of life (QoL). This contribution aims to describe the characteristics and psychometric properties of QoL assessment tools specifically designed for the condition of long-term cancer survivorship. Methods: We queried the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases, which allowed us to identify the pertinent papers, classified by the QoL tool they refer to. We then extracted the characteristics and the psychometric properties from each study. Results: From the initial 902 papers, 18 meet the selection criteria referring to eight QoL measurements. However, a multipart validation process in order to verify validity and reliability was only started for two of these tools. Conclusions: Even though clinical practice documents that long-term cancer survivors present with different symptoms and functional challenges compared to patients who are currently undergoing treatment as well as the general population, we still lack a quality of life tool that is specific for them, and that has verified psychometric properties. Even though some of the instruments we described are promising, it is necessary to continue their refinement.
KW - Assessment
KW - Long-term cancer survivorship
KW - Psychometrics
KW - Quality of life
KW - Questionnaire
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885655922&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885655922&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00520-013-1912-6
DO - 10.1007/s00520-013-1912-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 23903800
AN - SCOPUS:84885655922
SN - 0941-4355
VL - 21
SP - 3143
EP - 3152
JO - Supportive Care in Cancer
JF - Supportive Care in Cancer
IS - 11
ER -