TY - JOUR
T1 - Applicability of the appropriate use criteria for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in Italy
T2 - Preliminary results
AU - Medolago, G.
AU - Marcassa, C.
AU - Alkraisheh, A.
AU - Campini, R.
AU - Ghilardi, A.
AU - Giubbini, R.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Purpose: Clinical applicability of the appropriate use criteria for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging has not yet been evaluated in Italy. We investigated the applicability of the Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) in Italy. Methods: The indications for testing were prospectively recorded in three different nuclear cardiology laboratories: a general hospital, an academic hospital, and a tertiary centre. Indications were categorized as appropriate, uncertain or inappropriate according to the 2009 AUC; the specialty of the ordering physician was also noted. SPECT results were classified as: normal, probably normal, uncertain, probably abnormal, abnormal. The presence and severity of ischaemia were also noted. Results: Over a 9-month period, 2,134 patients (age 67±10 years, 68 % men) were evaluated (62 % exercise stress test). On average, there were 700 (84 %) appropriate, 73 (7 %) inappropriate and 93 (9 %) uncertain tests. The rates for the appropriateness of indications were comparable in men and women (84 % and 83 %, not significant). As expected, the rate of nonnormal studies was higher (58 %) for appropriate than for inappropriate (33 %) indications. Appropriateness was lower in the tertiary centre (74 %), and uncertain (16 %) and inappropriate (10 %) indications were more common; this was related to the higher rate of outpatients scheduled by nonhospital cardiologists (37 %). The most common indications associated with inappropriate testing were: chest pain, low likelihood of coronary artery disease, interpretable ECG and able to exercise (29 %), and asymptomatic
AB - Purpose: Clinical applicability of the appropriate use criteria for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging has not yet been evaluated in Italy. We investigated the applicability of the Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) in Italy. Methods: The indications for testing were prospectively recorded in three different nuclear cardiology laboratories: a general hospital, an academic hospital, and a tertiary centre. Indications were categorized as appropriate, uncertain or inappropriate according to the 2009 AUC; the specialty of the ordering physician was also noted. SPECT results were classified as: normal, probably normal, uncertain, probably abnormal, abnormal. The presence and severity of ischaemia were also noted. Results: Over a 9-month period, 2,134 patients (age 67±10 years, 68 % men) were evaluated (62 % exercise stress test). On average, there were 700 (84 %) appropriate, 73 (7 %) inappropriate and 93 (9 %) uncertain tests. The rates for the appropriateness of indications were comparable in men and women (84 % and 83 %, not significant). As expected, the rate of nonnormal studies was higher (58 %) for appropriate than for inappropriate (33 %) indications. Appropriateness was lower in the tertiary centre (74 %), and uncertain (16 %) and inappropriate (10 %) indications were more common; this was related to the higher rate of outpatients scheduled by nonhospital cardiologists (37 %). The most common indications associated with inappropriate testing were: chest pain, low likelihood of coronary artery disease, interpretable ECG and able to exercise (29 %), and asymptomatic
KW - Appropriate use criteria
KW - Myocardial imaging
KW - SPECT
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906048315&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906048315&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00259-014-2743-5
DO - 10.1007/s00259-014-2743-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 24633473
AN - SCOPUS:84906048315
SN - 0340-6199
VL - 41
SP - 1695
EP - 1700
JO - European Journal of Pediatrics
JF - European Journal of Pediatrics
IS - 9
ER -