TY - JOUR
T1 - Antithrombotic therapy in the postacute phase of cervical artery dissection
T2 - the Italian Project on Stroke in Young Adults Cervical Artery Dissection
AU - Pezzini, Debora
AU - Grassi, Mario
AU - Zedde, Maria Luisa
AU - Zini, Andrea
AU - Bersano, Anna
AU - Gandolfo, Carlo
AU - Silvestrelli, Giorgio
AU - Baracchini, Claudio
AU - Cerrato, Paolo
AU - Lodigiani, Corrado
AU - Marcheselli, Simona
AU - Paciaroni, Maurizio
AU - Rasura, Maurizia
AU - Cappellari, Manuel
AU - Del Sette, Massimo
AU - Cavallini, Anna
AU - Morotti, Andrea
AU - Micieli, Giuseppe
AU - Lotti, Enrico Maria
AU - Delodovici, Maria Luisa
AU - Gentile, Mauro
AU - Magoni, Mauro
AU - Azzini, Cristiano
AU - Calloni, Maria Vittoria
AU - Giorli, Elisa
AU - Braga, Massimiliano
AU - La Spina, Paolo
AU - Melis, Fabio
AU - Tassi, Rossana
AU - Terruso, Valeria
AU - Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore
AU - Piras, Valeria
AU - Giossi, Alessia
AU - Locatelli, Martina
AU - Mazzoleni, Valentina
AU - Sanguigni, Sandro
AU - Zanferrari, Carla
AU - Mannino, Marina
AU - Colombo, Irene
AU - Dallocchio, Carlo
AU - Nencini, Patrizia
AU - Bignamini, Valeria
AU - Adami, Alessandro
AU - Costa, Paolo
AU - Bella, Rita
AU - Pascarella, Rosario
AU - Padovan, Alessandro
AU - Pezzini, Alessandro
N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of antithrombotic therapy discontinuation in the postacute phase of cervical artery dissection (CeAD) on the mid-term outcome of these patients.METHODS: In a cohort of consecutive patients with first-ever CeAD, enrolled in the setting of the multicentre Italian Project on Stroke in Young Adults Cervical Artery Dissection, we compared postacute (beyond 6 months since the index CeAD) outcomes between patients who discontinued antithrombotic therapy and patients who continued taking antithrombotic agents during follow-up. Primary outcome was a composite of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack. Secondary outcomes were (1) Brain ischaemia ipsilateral to the dissected vessel and (2) Recurrent CeAD. Associations with the outcome of interest were assessed by the propensity score (PS) method.RESULTS: Of the 1390 patients whose data were available for the outcome analysis (median follow-up time in patients who did not experience outcome events, 36.0 months (25th-75th percentile, 62.0)), 201 (14.4%) discontinued antithrombotic treatment. Primary outcome occurred in 48 patients in the postacute phase of CeAD. In PS-matched samples (201 vs 201), the incidence of primary outcomes among patients taking antithrombotics was comparable with that among patients who discontinued antithrombotics during follow-up (5.0% vs 4.5%; p(log rank test)=0.526), and so was the incidence of the secondary outcomes ipsilateral brain ischaemia (4.5% vs 2.5%; p(log rank test)=0.132) and recurrent CeAD (1.0% vs 1.5%; p(log rank test)=0.798).CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy in the postacute phase of CeAD does not appear to increase the risk of brain ischaemia during follow-up.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of antithrombotic therapy discontinuation in the postacute phase of cervical artery dissection (CeAD) on the mid-term outcome of these patients.METHODS: In a cohort of consecutive patients with first-ever CeAD, enrolled in the setting of the multicentre Italian Project on Stroke in Young Adults Cervical Artery Dissection, we compared postacute (beyond 6 months since the index CeAD) outcomes between patients who discontinued antithrombotic therapy and patients who continued taking antithrombotic agents during follow-up. Primary outcome was a composite of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack. Secondary outcomes were (1) Brain ischaemia ipsilateral to the dissected vessel and (2) Recurrent CeAD. Associations with the outcome of interest were assessed by the propensity score (PS) method.RESULTS: Of the 1390 patients whose data were available for the outcome analysis (median follow-up time in patients who did not experience outcome events, 36.0 months (25th-75th percentile, 62.0)), 201 (14.4%) discontinued antithrombotic treatment. Primary outcome occurred in 48 patients in the postacute phase of CeAD. In PS-matched samples (201 vs 201), the incidence of primary outcomes among patients taking antithrombotics was comparable with that among patients who discontinued antithrombotics during follow-up (5.0% vs 4.5%; p(log rank test)=0.526), and so was the incidence of the secondary outcomes ipsilateral brain ischaemia (4.5% vs 2.5%; p(log rank test)=0.132) and recurrent CeAD (1.0% vs 1.5%; p(log rank test)=0.798).CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy in the postacute phase of CeAD does not appear to increase the risk of brain ischaemia during follow-up.
KW - Arteries
KW - Brain Ischemia/complications
KW - Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use
KW - Humans
KW - Stroke/complications
KW - Vertebral Artery Dissection/complications
KW - Young Adult
U2 - 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328338
DO - 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328338
M3 - Article
C2 - 35508372
SN - 0022-3050
VL - 93
SP - 686
EP - 692
JO - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
JF - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
IS - 7
ER -