TY - JOUR
T1 - Amethod for examining surface and interface irregularities after photorefractve keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis
T2 - Predictor of optical and functional outcomes
AU - Vinciguerra, P.
AU - Azzolini, M.
AU - Radice, P.
AU - Sborgia, M.
AU - De Molfetta, V.
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - PURPOSE: To develop a system for the examination of the ablated surface after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and to correlate the surface regularity to the functional outcome. METHODS: A Nidek Eas-1000 Anterior Eye Segment Analysis System was used to examine the ablated surface or the interface regularity immediately after PRK and LASIK. Eighty eyes were evaluated and divided into three study groups: group 1; regularity (18 eyes), group 2; mild irregularity (32 eyes), group 3; severe irregularity (30 eyes). RESULTS: At 12 months postoperatively, group 1 (regularity) showed the best percentage of eyes with 0 haze (100%) and with a refraction ±1.00 D of plano (89%); group 2 (mild irregularity) 84% had 0 haze and 62% were ± 1.00 D of plano; group 3 (severe irregularity) 27% had 0 haze and 47% were ± 1.00 D of plano. CONCLUSION: The patients with no postoperative irregularity had a sharply lower incidence of haze and a better refractive outcome with respect to plano, confirming the influence of ablation regularity on the results and the importance of this analysis in clinical practice.
AB - PURPOSE: To develop a system for the examination of the ablated surface after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and to correlate the surface regularity to the functional outcome. METHODS: A Nidek Eas-1000 Anterior Eye Segment Analysis System was used to examine the ablated surface or the interface regularity immediately after PRK and LASIK. Eighty eyes were evaluated and divided into three study groups: group 1; regularity (18 eyes), group 2; mild irregularity (32 eyes), group 3; severe irregularity (30 eyes). RESULTS: At 12 months postoperatively, group 1 (regularity) showed the best percentage of eyes with 0 haze (100%) and with a refraction ±1.00 D of plano (89%); group 2 (mild irregularity) 84% had 0 haze and 62% were ± 1.00 D of plano; group 3 (severe irregularity) 27% had 0 haze and 47% were ± 1.00 D of plano. CONCLUSION: The patients with no postoperative irregularity had a sharply lower incidence of haze and a better refractive outcome with respect to plano, confirming the influence of ablation regularity on the results and the importance of this analysis in clinical practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032038042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032038042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 9571554
AN - SCOPUS:0032038042
SN - 1081-597X
VL - 14
JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery
JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery
IS - 2 SUPPL.
ER -