TY - JOUR
T1 - Alternative transarterial access for CoreValve transcatheter aortic bioprosthesis implantation
AU - Bruschi, Giuseppe
AU - De Marco, Federico
AU - Modine, Thomas
AU - Botta, Luca
AU - Colombo, Paola
AU - Mauri, Silvia
AU - Cannata, Aldo
AU - Fratto, Pasquale
AU - Klugmann, Silvio
PY - 2015/5/1
Y1 - 2015/5/1
N2 - Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is used to treat elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis who are considered extremely high-risk surgical candidates. The safety and effectiveness of TAVI have been demonstrated in numerous studies. The self-expanding CoreValve bioprosthesis (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) was the first transcatheter aortic valve to be granted the Conformité Européene (CE) mark in May 2007 for retrograde transfemoral implantation. However, TAVI patients are also often affected by severe iliofemoral arteriopathy. In these patients, the retrograde transfemoral approach carries a high risk of vascular injury, making this approach unusable. Alternative arterial access sites, such as the subclavian artery, the ascending aorta, and the carotid artery, have been used for retrograde implantation of the CoreValve bioprosthesis. In the present report, we present the procedural considerations, risks, and benefits of the different types of arterial access used to implant the CoreValve bioprosthesis.
AB - Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is used to treat elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis who are considered extremely high-risk surgical candidates. The safety and effectiveness of TAVI have been demonstrated in numerous studies. The self-expanding CoreValve bioprosthesis (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) was the first transcatheter aortic valve to be granted the Conformité Européene (CE) mark in May 2007 for retrograde transfemoral implantation. However, TAVI patients are also often affected by severe iliofemoral arteriopathy. In these patients, the retrograde transfemoral approach carries a high risk of vascular injury, making this approach unusable. Alternative arterial access sites, such as the subclavian artery, the ascending aorta, and the carotid artery, have been used for retrograde implantation of the CoreValve bioprosthesis. In the present report, we present the procedural considerations, risks, and benefits of the different types of arterial access used to implant the CoreValve bioprosthesis.
KW - Aortic stenosis
KW - Catheter-based valve intervention
KW - CoreValve
KW - Structural heart disease
KW - transcatheter technique
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927659752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927659752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1586/17434440.2015.1005605
DO - 10.1586/17434440.2015.1005605
M3 - Article
C2 - 25672856
AN - SCOPUS:84927659752
SN - 1743-4440
VL - 12
SP - 279
EP - 286
JO - Expert Review of Medical Devices
JF - Expert Review of Medical Devices
IS - 3
ER -