TY - JOUR
T1 - A simplified algorithm may lead to overestimate dementia in PD. A clinical and epidemiological study using criteria for PD-D proposed by the Movement Disorders task force
AU - Di Battista, M. E.
AU - Giustini, P.
AU - Bernardi, S.
AU - Stirpe, P.
AU - Vanacore, N.
AU - Meco, Giuseppe
PY - 2011/11
Y1 - 2011/11
N2 - Making an accurate diagnosis of dementia in Parkinson's disease (PD-D) patients is a challenge that neurologists will have to face in the coming years. In 2007, a Task force of the Movement Disorders Society proposed operational diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of PD-D, consisting of step I and step II. We assessed the validity of step I with reference to the diagnosis made after a formal neuropsychological evaluation and by applying the current gold standard for the diagnosis of PD-D (DSM IV). Step had a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 95.5%. Step I displayed a positive predictive value of 70%, a negative predictive value of 97%, and an accuracy of 93.4%. The clinimetric properties observed in our setting suggest that step I may be considered as a good screening tool (negative predictive value of 97%); however, using step I alone to make a diagnosis of PD-D may lead to an overestimation of dementia in PD, particularly in patients with considerable dysexecutive deficits (positive predictive value of 70%). In conclusion, formal neuropsychology and longitudinal follow up are still required for the diagnosis and categorization of dementia in PD.
AB - Making an accurate diagnosis of dementia in Parkinson's disease (PD-D) patients is a challenge that neurologists will have to face in the coming years. In 2007, a Task force of the Movement Disorders Society proposed operational diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of PD-D, consisting of step I and step II. We assessed the validity of step I with reference to the diagnosis made after a formal neuropsychological evaluation and by applying the current gold standard for the diagnosis of PD-D (DSM IV). Step had a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 95.5%. Step I displayed a positive predictive value of 70%, a negative predictive value of 97%, and an accuracy of 93.4%. The clinimetric properties observed in our setting suggest that step I may be considered as a good screening tool (negative predictive value of 97%); however, using step I alone to make a diagnosis of PD-D may lead to an overestimation of dementia in PD, particularly in patients with considerable dysexecutive deficits (positive predictive value of 70%). In conclusion, formal neuropsychology and longitudinal follow up are still required for the diagnosis and categorization of dementia in PD.
KW - Parkinson dementia
KW - PD-D assessment
KW - PD-D diagnostic criteria
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855218511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855218511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00702-011-0638-1
DO - 10.1007/s00702-011-0638-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 21479865
AN - SCOPUS:84855218511
SN - 0375-9245
VL - 118
SP - 1609
EP - 1612
JO - Journal of Neuro-Visceral Relations
JF - Journal of Neuro-Visceral Relations
IS - 11
ER -