TY - JOUR
T1 - A randomised phase 2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine with or without capecitabine and cisplatin in locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma
AU - Reni, M
AU - Zanon, Silvia
AU - Balzano, G
AU - Passoni, P
AU - Pircher, C
AU - Chiaravalli, M
AU - Fugazza, Clara
AU - Ceraulo, D
AU - Nicoletti, R
AU - Arcidiacono, PG
AU - Macchini, M
AU - Peretti, U
AU - Castoldi, R
AU - Doglioni, C
AU - Falconi, M
AU - Partelli, S
AU - Gianni, L
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Background: The current trial assessed whether the addition of cisplatin and capecitabine to the nab-paclitaxel–gemcitabine backbone is feasible and active against borderline and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Method: Fifty-four chemo-naive patients, aged between 18 and 75 years, with a pathological diagnosis of locally advanced or borderline resectable PDAC were randomised to receive either nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, cisplatin and oral capecitabine (PAXG; arm A; N = 26) or nab-paclitaxel followed by gemcitabine (AG; arm B; N = 28). The primary end-point was the tumour resection rate. If at least four such resections were performed, the treatment was considered as active. The secondary end-points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours response rate, Hartman's pathologic response, carbohydrate antigen 19.9 response rate and toxicity. Results: Eight patients (31%) in the PAXG arm and nine (32%) in the AG arm underwent resection. PFS at 1-year was 58% in arm A and 39% in arm B. OS at 18-month was 69% in arm A and 54% in arm B. Conclusions: In this phase II study, the addition of cisplatin and capecitabine to the AG backbone was feasible and yielded promising results in terms of disease control without detrimental impact on tolerability. The approach warrants further investigation in a phase III study. Trial registration: NCT01730222. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
AB - Background: The current trial assessed whether the addition of cisplatin and capecitabine to the nab-paclitaxel–gemcitabine backbone is feasible and active against borderline and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Method: Fifty-four chemo-naive patients, aged between 18 and 75 years, with a pathological diagnosis of locally advanced or borderline resectable PDAC were randomised to receive either nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, cisplatin and oral capecitabine (PAXG; arm A; N = 26) or nab-paclitaxel followed by gemcitabine (AG; arm B; N = 28). The primary end-point was the tumour resection rate. If at least four such resections were performed, the treatment was considered as active. The secondary end-points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours response rate, Hartman's pathologic response, carbohydrate antigen 19.9 response rate and toxicity. Results: Eight patients (31%) in the PAXG arm and nine (32%) in the AG arm underwent resection. PFS at 1-year was 58% in arm A and 39% in arm B. OS at 18-month was 69% in arm A and 54% in arm B. Conclusions: In this phase II study, the addition of cisplatin and capecitabine to the AG backbone was feasible and yielded promising results in terms of disease control without detrimental impact on tolerability. The approach warrants further investigation in a phase III study. Trial registration: NCT01730222. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.007
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.007
M3 - Article
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 102
SP - 95
EP - 102
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -